Building actionable media insights

  • Home
  • Expertise
  • About
  • Pricing
  • Blog
  • Contact

Nov 23 2006

Is lobbying legitimate?


This morning I was at the Chartered Institute of Public Relations which was hosting a practitioner’s roundtable discussion on the legitimacy of lobbying. This discussion was being led by Lionel Zetter, the CIPR President elect, and from the lobbying firm Political Wizard. Central to the issue was the apparent widespread misconception of lobbists aims and methods. It is a fascinating area and one which poses particular challenges regarding its justification. How one measures success of a public affairs campaign is tied up with its objectives and whether these can be measured.
In this regard public affairs campaigns are no different to PR campaigns. In my ear I can hear ringing the comment “you are what you measure” (KD Payne), a comment which I am convinced is foreign to many in public affairs.
On a broader level the discussion dealt with the risks facing the discipline and its reputation from scandals and associated misconceptions of what the sector has to offer. There was an acknowledgement that public affairs is only an option for those with money and Andy Sawford, from Connect Public Affairs raised the point that the industry can benefit from rejecting its ‘Godfatherly’ overtones. This was followed by Donna Castle from the British Lung Foundation saying that money is often not an issue and that much can be achieved with next to no budget.
On the matter of self regulation, Simon Nayyar, from Edleman suggested that the sector could do worse than model itself on the service perception of the legal profession, where the contribution is often more highly valued.
Lionel Zetter said that we may only be one scandal away from full legislative regulation and that this would be a retrograde step. Personally I would like to uphold the comments by Donna Castle and suggest to organisations that if they have a strategy and an issue to support which they believe public affairs can contribute towards, they can achieve an awful lot themselves, irrespective of the budget.
To end I feel there is an educational message-that with basic guidance many can present an effective public affairs campaign using the tactics set out in books like ‘Public Affairs in Practice’ (Thompson and John, CIPR, 2006).

Written by Michael Blowers · Categorized: Uncategorized

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Thanks, please prove you are not a robot * Time limit is exhausted. Please reload the CAPTCHA.

Updates by Email

Please complete this form to sign-up to receive my blog posts by email. You can unsubscribe at any time and your email address will not be used for any other purpose.

About

Media analyst with a half an eye on what's coming down the road. Often caught out but always fascinated by the possibilities. Read More…

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Recent Tweets

Tweets by @michaelblowers

Tweets by @MediaEvaluatio1

Categories

  • #PRstack
  • AMEC
  • CIPR
  • Events
  • Future PR/Comms
  • Google Analytics
  • Google Cloud Natural Language
  • Influencer metrics
  • Integrated Evaluation Framework
  • Lead generation
  • Media Analysis
  • Media Evaluation
  • Media Research
  • PESO model
  • PR Awards
  • PR Evaluation
  • PR Measurement
  • PR Tools
  • Public Relations
  • Sentiment measurement
  • SMART Objectives
  • Social media listening
  • Uncategorized

Archives

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Expertise
  • About
  • Pricing
  • Awards
  • PR Professionals
  • Communications Measurement Professional
  • Contact
  • Cookies, etc

Copyright © 2025 · Altitude Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in